<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Online Laboratory of Kevin Zelnio &#187; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zelnio.org/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zelnio.org</link>
	<description>Deep Sea Biology &#124; Systematics &#38; Taxonomy &#124; Science Writing &#124; Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 04:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Women in Science FAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/10/23/women-in-science-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/10/23/women-in-science-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not entirely sure this ad on Science Magazine&#8216;s website needs much explaining of the blatant misogyny here. The look of ecstasy on the clear faced young attractive women, the dominating positioning of the gecko anole, an often masculine animal symbol, ever so precariously perched on her lips&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I am reading too much into it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/10/23/women-in-science-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Joy of Uncertainty</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Twain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teleology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is difficult to accept not knowing something. To have a definitive answer is to embrace certainty, to be in control of a situation. It is hard to blame a person for being wary of another for admitting not to know an answer, even an answer that a person should know. Can one be convinced by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Systematics</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Pennisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting news piece came out today in the most recent issue of Science. Elizabeth Pennisi reports that systematists are up in arms over pending patents on methods that have been in place for dozens of years. Such as a novel </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; way to use biological data that has been organized according to evolutionary relatedness. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
