<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin A. Zelnio &#187; LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zelnio.org/tag/linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zelnio.org</link>
	<description>Science Writing &#124; Marine Biology &#124; Evolution &#38; Ecology &#124; Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining Authorship?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/01/02/redefining-authorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/01/02/redefining-authorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m known for being stingy with my authorship lists. I don&#8217;t believe collecting samples, doing a couple PCRs, or otherwise being present, or even bouncing ideas off of, justifies you name as a author on scientific paper. I am skeptical of long author lists in top-tiered journals. I do like to promote my hard-working undergraduate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/01/02/redefining-authorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to PLoS Systematics?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomenclature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In May of 2008 I enthusiastically lauded PLoS ONE for publishing their first open access paper that described some new species of ants. It has been a year and half since then, have there been other taxonomists taking to this new concept of a completely online, open access forum for publishing new species? Currently, only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And I&#8217;m Off&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/16/and-im-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/16/and-im-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expeditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beagle Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.. to Brazil! I wrote up the details at Deep Sea News this week. Duke News and Communications just put up a press release about the project! &#8220;In an inspiring mix of 19th and 21st Century technologies, a Duke Marine Lab researcher will play the role of Charles Darwin on an upcoming oceanographic cruise off [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/16/and-im-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Following in Darwin&#8217;s Footsteps</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/01/following-in-darwins-footsteps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/01/following-in-darwins-footsteps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expeditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paraty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Beagle Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tocorime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This is reposted from Deep Sea News) In less than a month The HMS Beagle Project will conduct a feasibility study for doing modern oceanographic research aboard a sailing ship. The Brazilian tall ship Tocorimé will serve as the analogue HMS Beagle. I am honored to say that I will serve as the modern day [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/09/01/following-in-darwins-footsteps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Systematics Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoBL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Hebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alex, an entomologist at the fabulous Myrmecos blog, was also infuriated by the news piece by Pennisi (subscription required) in the latest issue of Science. His take was slightly different than my take on it a couple days ago. Alex is most upset about the pending Microsoft patent claim on, according to the language of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Systematics</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Pennisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting news piece came out today in the most recent issue of Science. Elizabeth Pennisi reports that systematists are up in arms over pending patents on methods that have been in place for dozens of years. Such as a novel &#8220;&#8230; way to use biological data that has been organized according to evolutionary relatedness. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

