<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Online Laboratory of Kevin Zelnio &#187; Systematics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zelnio.org/category/systematics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zelnio.org</link>
	<description>Deep Sea Biology &#124; Systematics &#38; Taxonomy &#124; Science Writing &#124; Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Retard Scientific Progress</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Szilard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managerialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I found a great quote and analogy from an essay published in Current Biology by  Peter Lawrence titled The mismeasurement of science.  This essay takes a look at how science is measured and examines the use  of impact factors and other metrics that measure scientific progress  for individual scientists, academic departments and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repost: Is the World of Taxonomy Ready for PLoS Systematics?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Zoological Nomenclature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zootaxa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was originally published February 20, 2008 at The Other 95%, where a good comment thread is also archived. I am reposting because I plan on discussing open access and electronic publishing in taxonomy more and feel this article sets the mood for my future thoughts. I recently posted an update on state of systematics [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to PLoS Systematics?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomenclature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Taxonomists move 2.718 times faster than ICZN, neither move fast enough.</p>
<p>In May of 2008 I enthusiastically lauded PLoS ONE for publishing their first open access paper that described some new species of ants. It has been a year and half since then, have there been other taxonomists taking to this new concept of a completely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Systematics Revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoBL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Hebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Alex, an entomologist at the fabulous Myrmecos blog, was also infuriated by the news piece by Pennisi (subscription required) in the latest issue of Science. His take was slightly different than my take on it a couple days ago. Alex is most upset about the pending Microsoft patent claim on, according to the language of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/14/patenting-systematics-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Systematics</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA Barcode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Pennisi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PNAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An interesting news piece came out today in the most recent issue of Science. Elizabeth Pennisi reports that systematists are up in arms over pending patents on methods that have been in place for dozens of years. Such as a novel </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; way to use biological data that has been organized according to evolutionary relatedness. It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/08/patenting-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
