<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Online Laboratory of Kevin Zelnio &#187; Doing Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zelnio.org/category/doing-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zelnio.org</link>
	<description>Deep Sea Biology &#124; Systematics &#38; Taxonomy &#124; Science Writing &#124; Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Retard Scientific Progress</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 03:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics of Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leo Szilard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managerialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I found a great quote and analogy from an essay published in Current Biology by  Peter Lawrence titled The mismeasurement of science.  This essay takes a look at how science is measured and examines the use  of impact factors and other metrics that measure scientific progress  for individual scientists, academic departments and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/07/12/how-to-retard-scientific-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Access Taxonomy and PLoS</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/19/open-access-taxonomy-and-plos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/19/open-access-taxonomy-and-plos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid Journals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Elements of this post are taken from my article &#8220;PLoS ONE Publishes First Taxonomic Paper&#8221; on The Other 95% on May 28, 2008. I&#8217;ve reposted it here as I am collecting my thoughts about open access publishing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Why should one support open access publishing of taxonomic papers?
Visibility is important to the field of systematics, where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/19/open-access-taxonomy-and-plos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repost: Is the World of Taxonomy Ready for PLoS Systematics?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Zoological Nomenclature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zootaxa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This article was originally published February 20, 2008 at The Other 95%, where a good comment thread is also archived. I am reposting because I plan on discussing open access and electronic publishing in taxonomy more and feel this article sets the mood for my future thoughts. I recently posted an update on state of systematics [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2010/02/04/repost-is-the-world-of-taxonomy-ready-for-plos-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happened to PLoS Systematics?</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICZN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nomenclature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLoS ONE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">Taxonomists move 2.718 times faster than ICZN, neither move fast enough.</p>
<p>In May of 2008 I enthusiastically lauded PLoS ONE for publishing their first open access paper that described some new species of ants. It has been a year and half since then, have there been other taxonomists taking to this new concept of a completely [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/11/02/what-ever-happened-to-plos-systematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Joy of Uncertainty</title>
		<link>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Zelnio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doing Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conclusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Twain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teleology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zelnio.org/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is difficult to accept not knowing something. To have a definitive answer is to embrace certainty, to be in control of a situation. It is hard to blame a person for being wary of another for admitting not to know an answer, even an answer that a person should know. Can one be convinced by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zelnio.org/2009/08/23/the-joy-of-uncertainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
